Evidence Standards
Governance, Methodology & Evidence
Transparent review, evidence standards and revision history
Distinguish evidence from interpretation while documenting shared review, cultural accountability, rights, licensing, uncertainty, and institutional approval.
Evidence firstVersion controlledStudent poweredReviewed & validated
Chichén ItzáYucatán Work in progress Core synchronized
Reviews Completed54Current project status
Pending Reviews18Current project status
Validation Checks42%Current project status
Next Review CycleMay 30Current project status
Archaeological Reports142Current project status
Methodological Note
Foundation
Completeness 35%● In progress
Geometry
Completeness 47%● In progress
Materials
Completeness 59%● In progress
Interpretation
Completeness 71%● In progress
Validation
Completeness 83%● In progress
Version history & contributor activity
| Version | Date | Description | Contributor | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1.6 | May 20 | Updated geometry and alignment | Dr. Elena Marín | Current |
| v1.5 | May 14 | Material map refinements | Miguel Hernández | Archived |
| v1.4 | May 07 | Review adjustments | Sofía Delgado | Archived |
Methodological note
All assumptions, evidence sources, competing interpretations, review actions, and field-validation results remain traceable through the Stella Nova governance framework.
Read full methodology →Research community comments
D
Prof. David Webster Strong progress. Preserve the alternative hypotheses as the model advances.
Dr. Elena Marín The project remains appropriately transparent about what is measured, inferred, and still unresolved.